>
> >>>>> Peder Chr Norgaard writes:
>
> >> I actually think that your proposal is the better solution, but it
> >> will take more time to implement, document and test your solution.
>
> Peder> I agree with you on both assertions in this last paragraph :-)
>
> Peder> so the decision is really just for you to make. I can live
> Peder> very well with both solutions.
>
> I will look into the source code and the test suite over the weekend.
> For now, you may want to try the following little patch which changes
> the implementation for the Tnm::mib defval command.
>
Hello Juergen.
I've tried the patch, it works like a charm. Thank you very much.
--peder chr.
-- !! This message is brought to you via the `tkined & scotty' mailing list. !! Please do not reply to this message to unsubscribe. To subscribe or !! unsubscribe, send a mail message to <tkined-request@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>. !! See http://wwwsnmp.cs.utwente.nl/~schoenw/scotty/ for more information.