Louis> I've got no problem with the SNMPv2u code going away. If it's
Louis> not too much trouble, it might be nice to preserve SNMPv2c,
Louis> though not essential.
I agree. SNMPv2c is being supported by some vendors now - removing it
would be a bad idea. Keeping SNMPv2c support in the source is really
no big deal. Keeping USEC is a bit more painful because the security
stuff changed quite a bit in SNMPv3 and this would bloat the source.
Juergen
-- Juergen Schoenwaelder schoenw@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de http://www.cs.tu-bs.de/~schoenw Technical University Braunschweig, Dept. Operating Systems & Computer Networks Bueltenweg 74/75, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany. (Tel. +49 531 / 391 3283)-- !! This message is brought to you via the `tkined & scotty' mailing list. !! Please do not reply to this message to unsubscribe. To subscribe or !! unsubscribe, send a mail message to <tkined-request@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>. !! See http://wwwsnmp.cs.utwente.nl/~schoenw/scotty/ for more information.