RE: [tkined] script compatibility (scotty 2.1.11 vs. 3.0.0)

From: John Karsten (john.karsten@home.com)
Date: Thu Nov 29 2001 - 21:36:57 MET

I had no problems upgrading, just cut and paste. The benefit is total
stability. I did have the new version spawn so many processes during a
network outage that it locked my box but then its only a 166. I have it
monitoring our ATM and gigabit networks at work on a P2 without problem and
we spent 500 grand on an Openview system. Its great!

John

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-tkined@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de
[mailto:owner-tkined@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de]On Behalf Of Juergen Schoenwaelder
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 2:26 AM
To: torsten.dieckmann@t-online.de
Cc: tkined@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de
Subject: Re: [tkined] script compatibility (scotty 2.1.11 vs. 3.0.0)

>>>>> T Dieckmann writes:

Torsten> I heard the API has changed with scotty3.0.0.

Correct.

Torsten> Can we execute scripts written for scotty2.1.11 also with the
Torsten> new version?

Not without changes.

Torsten> If not, how big are the needed modifications for snmp and mib
Torsten> related commands?

Check out the 3.0.0 manual pages. Usually, the changes are relatively
easy and straight-forward. How much work it is in your case depends on
your script of course.

/js 

--
!! This message is brought to you via the `tkined & scotty' mailing list.
!! Please do not reply to this message to unsubscribe. To subscribe or
!! unsubscribe, send a mail message to <tkined-request@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>.
!! See http://wwwsnmp.cs.utwente.nl/~schoenw/scotty/ for more information.

--
!! This message is brought to you via the `tkined & scotty' mailing list.
!! Please do not reply to this message to unsubscribe. To subscribe or
!! unsubscribe, send a mail message to <tkined-request@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>.
!! See http://wwwsnmp.cs.utwente.nl/~schoenw/scotty/ for more information.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 03 2002 - 14:56:28 MET