>>>>> dwetzel writes:
dwetzel> i used to work heavily with scotty 2 years ago now i'm at
dwetzel> uunet as a presale and do no more tcl programming but i still
dwetzel> received tkined list email :) and i still follow snmpv3
dwetzel> advancement, from my point of view it seems that the adoption
dwetzel> of snmpv3 is still far away. we at uunet are beginning to use
dwetzel> it for one product. i have the feeling that snmpv3 will do
dwetzel> as well as snmpv2. :) and that we are going to use snmpv1 for
dwetzel> a long time. i'm curious to see the opinion of people in
dwetzel> that list.
I am a bit more optimistic about SNMPv3. We have many independent
implementation. And we have the UCD SNMPv3 implementation - freely
available code is sometimes the key to deploy technology. But I agree,
it will take a long long time until there will be significant SNMPv3
deployment and SNMPv1 will stay with us for a long time. (But this
true for all successful technologies like e.g. IPv4 or even Fortran.)
/js
-- Juergen Schoenwaelder Technical University Braunschweig <schoenw@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de> Dept. Operating Systems & Computer Networks Phone: +49 531 391 3289 Bueltenweg 74/75, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany Fax: +49 531 391 5936 <URL:http://www.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de/~schoenw/>-- !! This message is brought to you via the `tkined & scotty' mailing list. !! Please do not reply to this message to unsubscribe. To subscribe or !! unsubscribe, send a mail message to <tkined-request@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>. !! See http://wwwsnmp.cs.utwente.nl/~schoenw/scotty/ for more information.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 08 2001 - 15:27:34 MET