Michael> Thanks to J. Choate (cc'd), a few more bugs have been
Michael> fixed in the sub-ranges patch.
Nice work. I scanned through the diff and there are some things to
improve. You are using two int variables to store the upper and lower
bounds of a range. The interesting thing is that you can define ranges
for Integer32 types as well as Unsigned32 types. This means that you
can't store the bounds of a range in a structure with two ints - at
least if you do not want to cast things based on the base type. :-)
Anyway, I decided to take this patch as a starting point to integrate
support for ranges in the upcoming next version. I think I can even
simplify some things. Watch for it in one of the next snapshots.
Thanks again for writing this piece of code,
Juergen
-- Juergen Schoenwaelder schoenw@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de http://www.cs.tu-bs.de/~schoenw Technical University Braunschweig, Dept. Operating Systems & Computer Networks Bueltenweg 74/75, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany. (Tel. +49 531 / 391 3283)-- !! This message is brought to you via the `tkined & scotty' mailing list. !! Please do not reply to this message to unsubscribe. To subscribe or !! unsubscribe, send a mail message to <tkined-request@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>. !! See http://wwwsnmp.cs.utwente.nl/~schoenw/scotty/ for more information.