Re: Scotty on Windows95?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Doug Hughes: "Re: 147% Interface load"
• Previous message: Jochen Wiedmann: "147% Interface load"
• Maybe in reply to: Scott Koumjian: "Scotty on Windows95?"

Scott> I know from the scotty FAQ that scotty compiles and runs on
Scott> Windows NT, but will it compile and run on Windows 95? If
Scott> not, are there any plans to do this and/or how difficult would
Scott> it be to get scotty running on Windows 95? (I am not a
Scott> Windows person, so I do not know the underlying differences
Scott> between Windows NT and Windows 95)

I think that the Tnm extension should run on Windows 95 without
changes. If you have problems that are specific to Windows 95, please
post them here so we can try to fix them.
Juergen

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder schoenw@cs.utwente.nl http://www.cs.utwente.nl/~schoenw
Computer Science Department, University of Twente,   (Fax: +31-53-489-3247)
P.O. Box 217, NL-7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands.  (Tel. +31-53-489-3678)
--
!! This message is brought to you via the `tkined & scotty' mailing list.
!! Please do not reply to this message to unsubscribe. To subscribe or
!! unsubscribe, send a mail message to <tkined-request@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de>.
!! See http://wwwsnmp.cs.utwente.nl/~schoenw/scotty/ for more information.





 Next message: Doug Hughes: "Re: 147% Interface load"
 Previous message: Jochen Wiedmann: "147% Interface load"
 Maybe in reply to: Scott Koumjian: "Scotty on Windows95?"